From this I conclude:
E=FT
Yes, it's been copyrighted and has been submitted to Prof. Stephen W. Hawking CH CBE FRS.His (automated) response:Professor Hawking very much regrets that due to the severe limitations he works under, and the huge amount of mail he receives, he may not have time to write you a reply. All e-mail is read. We do not have the facilities in to deal with the specific scientific enquiries, or theories we receive.Please see the website for more information about Professor Hawking, his life and his work.Yours faithfullyDavid PondGraduate Assistant to
Professor S W Hawking CH CBE FRSDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge,
CB3 0WA.
United Kingdom.
March 13, 2006
Prof. Stephen Hawking
[Address]Re: Unified Field Theory
Dear Dr. Hawking:
My name is Julie F. Kadas. […3 paragraphs of background information on me…]
Of particular interest to me was the Cosmos series put together by Dr. Carl Sagan, his wife, Ann Druyan, and their colleagues. I started seriously pondering all of the ‘facts’ that Dr. Sagan presented in his program. I asked a lot of questions of myself, of my parents (who have always encouraged and supported me in my quest for truth and knowledge) and of the universe itself. I wanted the universe to reveal its true nature to me like so many have before. After many, many, many years of this type of thinking and inquiry, I have come to several conclusions:
Point 1: We are currently traveling near the speed of light.
Argument: One of the signs of near light speed travel indicated by Dr. Sagan is the (lensing) effect of objects that are behind the observer being perceived to be in the forward field of view of the observer.
How can I say this is happening? No matter where in spacetime we point our telescopes, we always see back in time. There is no point in spacetime at which we can point our telescopes and say, “That is the future.” Due to the fact that our speed is approaching the speed of light, the whole universe (all of spacetime) appears to be in front of us. If the past is always behind us and the future is always in front (your light cone analogy), then I would argue that we are traveling near the speed of light because no matter where we look, we only see (limited) elements of the past.
Point 2: Black holes are the coldest elements of our universe and all matter is drawn to them (not only because of their massive gravitational attraction, but also) because of their low temperature.
Argument: The laws of thermodynamics state that heat moves toward cold. We can see this in action any day of the week all around us on Earth and in space. I propose that another factor in the movement of matter, mass and energy in, around or near a black hole is the temperature of the material in question. Although the matter around a black hole is (or can be) extremely hot, the black hole itself is absolute zero. The heat and motion of the material entering the event horizon of the black hole is (the closer it gets to the singularity) siphoned away from its parent mass/energy/matter and reverse fractionated off (of its parent) and into the black hole in a fashion reminiscent of the stacking in the game Tetris©.
I refer specifically to the Zeroth Law and the First Law of Thermodynamics for the aforementioned.
[NOTE: If you take away heat, gravity's effects are measurably stronger. The less heat present, the stronger the effects of gravity. The more heat present, the weaker the effects of gravity. The gravity around a yellow star is weaker than that of an object whose mass is equal to that of a yellow star, but is in fact 'dark matter' -- matter which does not generate its own heat or light, like the moon or the atoms in the intervening spaces in the universe between what's lit and what not visible to us yet.]
If it was not the case that the Zeroth Law was true, then all galaxies passing other galaxies would merge. (Really, all matter passing other matter would eventually merge.) Because of the Zeroth Law, you can have two galaxies in thermal equilibrium pass each other due to the fact that one of the conditions for the addition of material to a black hole is not met. Specifically, a difference in temperature which would initiate the movement of heat to cold to gain equilibrium. One cannot make a diamond by throwing carbon atoms together and providing some heat and some pressure. These amounts are specific and must be mixed in the proper ratio. The same goes for a black hole. Just because you have mass and gravity and low temperature does not mean you: a) have a black hole, or b) have a stable black hole. Black holes can be broken by the tiniest fraction of ‘unrefined matter.’ That is to say, matter that has not gone through the specific steps necessary to reverse fractionate it into the black hole. (It has not been properly Tetrised in the black hole.)
The First Law is demonstrated when the heat of the material in the event horizon of a black hole becomes superheated due to its proximity to other systems in the same event horizon whose heat also contributes to the system in question. The interface between the event horizon of the black hole and the black hole itself is (to my way of thinking) a gigantic Peltier with the cold side facing in (if ‘in’ has any meaning here it would be toward the black hole).
[NOTE: If you are still looking for the universe's missing matter, re-read the above argument. Anything: matter, energy, time, whatever you choose will be exponentially more receptive to being in close proximity to another thing as that thing or those things get colder. Heat, by definition, causes matter to move FASTER and FARTHER APART. It is highly unlikely that a black hole would develop from a hot object (the center of a sun, for example) than it would be for that sun to result from the collapse of absolute zero spacetime - what we commonly call 'dark matter' is what should come to mind here... Cold is the key to the universe.]
Point 3: Time is of the essence. Without the inclusion of time in a measurement, the measurement is incorrect by a predefined amount based on the type of time in which (or with which) one is dealing.
Argument: Generally speaking, a measurement will be essentially correct if the unit being measured is in our spacetime. That is to say, in our part of spacetime (E=mc2 -land), a measurement will be correct because the laws of physics as they have been defined work for the short term. But, the more time that passes over which the measurement has been made, the more incorrect the measurement will be. Of course, if one was to apply the measurement from our spacetime to either a quantum unit (less than a Planck length – “little time”) or macro unit (greater than a Planck length – “big time”) [meaning any length of time which is bigger than that which we are able to measure. For example, any wavelength whose frequency = 1 over 16 billion light years. We have incorrectly assumed that since we can only 'see' approximately 15 billion light years out that that must be all there is to the universe. I believe that we have not yet built the machine which will detect the low temperature, fast-moving, dark, fluffy 'matter' of which the universe is chiefly comprised...that which we cannot currently account for. ], the measurement would be obviously incorrect. Time, and the type of time (which kind of time the measurement is being made in or for), is essential to the assignment of the proper meaning of the end result of a calculation or measurement. As we are aware, perspective is very important and thus, so is the type of time referenced in a calculation or measurement.
Point 4: Time and energy are linked and exist in 3 defined states.
Argument: Quanta: Energy is its most active (kinetic energy) and least efficient. Any information that is to be transmitted can only go a minute distance before being lost. The energy/information relationship decays so quickly (and exists in ‘little time’ – a type of time that we struggle to measure accurately) that we only perceive the merest of hints that a transaction took place. The only option this type of energy (and time) have is to “fall” into matter (and our time). Matter is the effluent of energy.
Relativity: As energy becomes matter (sticky energy), time becomes sticky as well, and units of time are therefore apparent and are now measurable. Both energy and matter are apparent. This ratio makes up our spacetime. Though there are many (less than half to begin with, then more than half as time progresses) instances of an increase in energy (one example is the First Law of Thermodynamics), the long term end result is one in which the ratio of matter to energy is ever increasing and eventually matter becomes the predominant entity (a singularity).
Macro or Big Time: Singularity is the “at rest” state of energy. A singularity is absolute zero. All matter (and the energy from which it was born) has been Tetrised and exists as a perfect solid (not Pathagoras’ or Platos’). The information that is carried in this state is now free from the matter that would prevent it from traveling (transmitting) freely, and skates “atop” the hypercooled mass unimpeded. In this state information transmission appears as if it:
a) travels faster than the speed of light (though light itself can not exist here),
b) increases in speed with the passage of time (bearing in mind that time is ‘big’), and
c) transmits its message an infinite distance instantaneously.Though the three items above are untrue, it appears as if that is what is happening. Here’s why:
Because information, and the transmission thereof, is not dependent on matter, it is free (literally) to cavort with, and be indiscernible from, neighboring information, if I have a message, and you have a message, and we are standing in the same spacetime (it is a singularity after all), and we are not prevented from sharing our information with each other or other information, and there is nothing to prevent us from transmitting each other’s information along with our own (non-sticky land), then it will appear as if all information is being transmitted simultaneously without impedance across an infinite distance in less than the apparent time it takes to create the information being transmitted.* There is no distance in a singularity so all information is everywhere everywhen.
*I refer to this phenomenon as the ‘borrowed energy’ effect, where energy is neither introduced nor lost, but simply acts as if there is more energy than originally existed. (A similar effect happens in our spacetime on a lesser scale. The winds of Neptune fly around the planet ever faster. This happens not because there is more energy being expended to increase the speed of the winds, (which would result in an increase in overall energy which could be measured [First Law again]), but because the resistance to the existing energetic motion is in a state of unbalance (coefficient of friction does not cancel out or overtake the energy expressed by the wind) resulting in faster windspeed. I wonder: If we were observers in quantum spacetime looking at this phenomenon in relativistic spacetime, would we see this increase as a form of perpetual motion and throw away our theories?)
Point 5: Pi is a better measuring stick for the passage (and type) of time than the atom.
Argument: As evidenced by my previous arguments (and as is generally accepted [at least for quantum theory]), atoms cannot exist in either quantum time or big time and are therefore, a poor gauge for the passage of time or the measurement of spacetime.
Pi is, however, a reliable and useful tool in the measurement of spacetime and the passage of time in general. Here’s how:
Going back to my third argument in which I state time is of the essence, and since I firmly believe that all measurements should include a variable (or depending on one’s perspective [that is, in which spacetime one resides] or the goal of the calculation/measurement – a constant) for time, then the currently accepted understanding of Pi must also include a variable for time.
If one is to measure a distance (in this case Pi) then in order to make that measurement one would need to begin the measurement and then end the measurement. A beginning and an end cannot happen simultaneously. One begins the measurement and one ends the measurement. Time of length lp must pass in order for the measurement to be completed. This means that time has passed and spacetime has been created while you were performing your measurements and is affecting the outcome of your calculation. (This is where one must choose for which spacetime the calculation is being performed.)
Even though it currently appears that in our spacetime Pi represents an infinitely long number (the irrationality of which is unimportant to this argument), I propose that Pi represents a number that is finite but ever increasing due to: a) the passage of time, and b) the expansion of spacetime. (How much spacetime has passed (the rate at which Pi is decreasing - as spacetime is being compressed, we will be able to measure completely the value of Pi because our computers are getting faster while the universe is getting closer together and less energetic) is ultimately dependent on which spacetime the observer chooses to perform the calculation and what goal the calculation is to attain.)
We are aware that Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. Unfortunately, time has not been accounted for in this measurement and that leaves a vital clue about the nature of Pi unrepresented. If we think of time using your representation of it as a light cone, then one must conclude that when one measures the diameter of any given circle, there is a beginning to the measurement and an ending to the measurement during which time has passed. This being the case, and knowing that a beginning and an end cannot happen simultaneously, one must conclude that the passage of time has offset the beginning measurement from the end measurement by a length of time represented as lp . This means that the start point and the end point can never meet – they pass each other always by length lp [...because time and space are being created not only while the measurement is taking place, but also after the measurement has taken place. Whatever markers were used to denote 'start' and 'stop' will move away from each other due to the expansion of spacetime.] Thus, the calculation never actually ends, it is merely marked along the way with whatever points we assign it.
If we were to superimpose a dot onto your light cone representing a start point, and then add another dot representing an end point, we would see clearly that these points were offset (if even by the minutest of lengths) and that picture would (if drawn though enough time for an observer to reveal a long term pattern) show a spiral or coil that is indistinguishable from the skin of the light cone which expands (as does the light cone itself) with the passage of time.
The crux of this argument is to say that Pi is representative of an ever expanding coil, the tightness of which is representative of the speed with which time is passing and with which spacetime is growing. (I can draw you a very rudimentary picture if you would like, but for now I will assume you are able to follow along. I plan on creating a graphic representation which will illustrate my point as a clear visual which will capture the elements of this argument.)
Taking this argument to the next step, one must apply (or reapply if in our spacetime) this means of calculating Pi to both quantum time and ‘big time’ for the full scope of this now complete calculation to reveal its true nature.
I do have several other thoughts about the nature of spacetime, irrational numbers, dark matter, faster than light objects, opacity, diffusion and total internal reflection that I would share if you have the time or the inclination to consider more from me, but for now, I am satisfied to have expressed the above to you.
I am aware that you are busy. I do not expect much. I really just wanted to express that perhaps the quest for a beautiful equation has been the thrust of so many for so long that we may have overlooked another possibility which would lend itself to a better understanding of our universe.
I thank you for your time. I ask that you please excuse the informal nature of this letter and the rudimentary manner in which I went about expressing my thoughts and ideas to you. I have no formal mathematical training which would allow me to converse on a level more befitting a man of your intellectual stature.
Lastly, I have included my formula for a Unified Field Theory. I hope it has some merit and will spark some interest in the scientific community. I expect that the idea of a formula as opposed to an equation will raise some eyebrows. My hope is that, even though the numbers may be incorrect, the idea of a formula may move the current school of thought in a direction that may have been overlooked. As a scientist, it would be most rewarding to have assisted in the quest for the answer.
Respectfully,
Julie F. Kadas
In a follow-up letter I sent to Dr. Hawking's assistant, Mr. Pond, on April 15, 2006, I further explained:
"I don't know of any other UFT's that include the calculation that provides the ratio between the passage of time and an increase in gravity (or any of the other relationships my theory describes). The theory also provides for a very specific path from energy to matter and matter to time. I believe I can also explain precisely how a black hole "evaporates" and where it evaporates to."
In a letter I sent to another scientist (who will not be named here) on May 20, 2006, I further explained:
"The UFT as it is attached here is for calculating within, or for, a particular type of time. I beleive the complete equation that represents what all 3 equations calculate is: E=F(sub Planck length)T. So, Energy = Force x Time. The trick is associating the right force within the correct type of time. (If you do it wrong, your universe could be backwards and upside down, diagonally oriented or twisted like the double-helix in DNA.)"
E=FT
An email from a friend dated April 21, 2006 asked (after seeing the formula):
"Hello
Is that a time machine of sorts?
I'm curious. Let me know.Thanks."
My response:
"Not quite. It explains the relationship between the passage of time and the ever increasing effects of gravity. It also explains the relationship between Pi and Time, Energy and Mass, Energy and the passage of Time, Energy and Gravity, etc. I believe it further shows that energy falls into mass, mass falls into time and time goes through the singularity (which is absolute zero providing no resistance whatsoever) and becomes...
There is (in further explanation to my 'not quite' response) an explanation within the equation as to how one could build a singularity. However, we would need a computer the size of at least a galaxy in order to calculate the potential outcome over several trillion tries. As we are completely inept at forecasting the weather only 1 week out, we will be wholly unsuccessful at the aforementioned calculations (which would predict the size and location of our singularity among many other things) and we could only guess where would might turn up in the universe if we could further calculate (separate calculation altogether) the "time traveler's" disposition before, during and after passage through the wormhole.
Time always moves in a forward direction. However, I am of the belief (as are some others) that ALL realities exist simultaneously and the singularity or "wormhole" one might create with the assistance of the formula I have described would potentially permit the traveller to jump from one reality to another - but not back in time. You can, of course, travel very quickly forward in time. However, there is no currently known or accepted way to travel back into time to one's original position.
Since you have asked, I have included my letter to Dr. Hawking for your review. Your comments and suggestions and any discussion is very welcome. I have more detailed explanations beyond the letter, but I did not want to be too wordy for him since I wanted him to read and become interested in my theory enough to write and ask me more about it. I wanted him to inquire and require more complete information and explanations re the formula.
Science is where my heart is. I love this stuff. Thanks for writing and asking. I hope you are not sorry you did!"
:)His further response (in part) on April 23, 2006:
I DO appreciate the hard work exibited in your theory. For me, I try not to question nature as I'm sure the second I have it figured out a new factor would change the equation. Not to discourage anyone else from figuring things, but personally I use instinct and faith to answer such questions. I used to consider it as mortals insulting to the creator to question or trivialize natures way but have grown to realize also that we ourselves are made in the likeness therefore creators too which means it's all part of it.
Living Loving Laughing and Leaving a Legacy.Thanks!
My response:
My theory is just that...a theory. I am an atheist, but I am curious and kind and want to understand more about the nature of all things and people. I like the fact that I will never know the answer. It is the quest that keeps me going. I like the way knowledge is updated daily. I like the way it changes and doesn't reveal itself. I don't mind not knowing. My theory also states that if you think you know...give it time. You will see that what you 'know' is only a temporary knowledge of a transient thing. We are incapable of really knowing that in which we are so deeply immersed. It is in trying to understand that we grow. I think both those who have religion and those who do not are still aiming for a more complete understanding of their world. We can all grow as people and as a species and as a global community. We all have much to learn. We all have much to gain from our efforts to understand the world and each other.
Yesterday, I celebrated the only holiday I celebrate all year. (I do not celebrate birthdays or holidays other than that one.) I hope you had a wonderful Earth Day.
Thank you for your kindness,
Julie
This site is soon to be updated. I am going to upload sturdier scientific arguments, and better insights into my thought processes. Shortly after that, I hope to include some video that will illustrate my ideas as well as answer some of the questions posed to me by various scientists.
Check back soon!!
Today's Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008
You can, however, find some good stuff here.
This is what I am working on:
1. There is no gravity.
2. No two parallel lines are parallel to infinity. Eventually, all 'parallel' lines intersect because all spacetime is curved back on itself (why we can only 'see' some 16 billion light years back in time and not all the way back. Even is spacetiime is actually open, our instruments fall prey to the recurve effect and therefore, we cannot see past a certain point in spacetime. It appears as if we have reached the limit or some boundary when in fact, we may just not be able to overcome the recurve.)
3. E=FT where: (so, NOT E=mc2 because it does not work with quanta)
a. Energy is measured in standard units (joules, say)
b. Force is measured strictly in terms of thermodynamic and fluid processes (without gravition and without mass) so, strictly momentum or, p=mv (the value for p should be here as a conglomerate of the aforementioned fluidic processes.)
1. lightmass will already be included as a measure of Force. Its momentum has not been included in previous calculations and is part of the 'dark matter' we seek. Think of it as a 'dark force' instead. (Further notes re: calculation of light(mass) in a closed box will be included shortly.)
2. force is to be quantified as the difference in the displacement of spacetime from one moment to the next as said force is applied (see below reference to division by zero and duplicate markers)
c. Time is measured only as a rate of change. (symbol delta) Change being the quantifiable (in any capacity) difference between this moment and that moment. The difference between any moment and any other moment will be the definition of the passage of a single unit of time. If anything changes, in fact, something would have to change - anywhere in that moment (the moment being measured) - for certain knowledge that a unit of time has passed.
Note: If, in this calculation you decided to choose the same exact moment against which to perform the measurement of the rate of change, you would find that this is a division by zero. What division by zero acutally means is that no rate of change has been indicated from the 'markers' used to denote the original position of the first time. A second set of 'markers' was never developed and the first set was instead copied and essentially 'overlayed' and then the calculation was performed. If you were to see this visually, you would envision the world just outside your eyes as clearly defined as you seek. Then, division by zero obscures your view of everything because the overlay of the exact same markers obscures your view. The world is still there, your markers - each pair - are there, but one set of reference points has perfectly obscured your intial reference points and it seems all has fallen away when in reality, if you moved even a fraction of an inch, you would again see the whole world, from a slightly different perspective along with both pairs of markers looking more like a slightly thickened line (line sets, or curves) in space.
Further notations follow in explanation of the aforementioned:
T1
Point 1: We are currently traveling near the speed of light.Argument: One of the signs of near light speed travel indicated by Dr. Sagan is the (lensing) effect of objects that are behind the observer being perceived to be in the forward field of view of the observer.
Predicts? 091907It predicts that the magnetic flip that is set to occur, will affect many more than was previously thought.
T2
Point 2: Black holes are the coldest elements of our universe and all matter is drawn to them (not only because of their massive gravitational attraction, but also) because of their low temperature.Argument: The laws of thermodynamics state that heat moves toward cold. We can see this in action any day of the week all around us on Earth and in space. I propose that another factor in the movement of matter, mass and energy in, around or near a black hole is the temperature of the material in question. Although the matter around a black hole is (or can be) extremely hot, the black hole itself is absolute zero. The heat and motion of the material entering the event horizon of the black hole is (the closer it gets to the singularity) siphoned away from its parent mass/energy/matter and reverse fractionated off (of its parent) and into the black hole in a fashion reminiscent of the stacking in the game Tetris©.
To: Thoughts on Sigularities,
Thoughts on SigularitiesFrom: T2,
T3
Point 3: Time is of the essence. Without the inclusion of time in a measurement, the measurement is incorrect by a predefined amount based on the type of time in which (or with which) one is dealing.Argument: Generally speaking, a measurement will be essentially correct if the unit being measured is in our spacetime. That is to say, in our part of spacetime (E=mc2 -land), a measurement will be correct because the laws of physics as they have been defined work for the short term. But, the more time that passes over which the measurement has been made, the more incorrect the measurement will be. Of course, if one was to apply the measurement from our spacetime to either a quantum unit (less than a Planck length - "little time") or macro unit (greater than a Planck length - "big time") [meaning any length of time which is bigger than that which we are able to measure. For example, any wavelength whose frequency = 1 over 16 billion light years. We have incorrectly assumed that since we can only 'see' approximately 15 billion light years out that that must be all there is to the universe. I believe that we have not yet built the machine which will detect the low temperature, fast-moving, dark, fluffy 'matter' of which the universe is chiefly comprised...that which we cannot currently account for. ], the measurement would be obviously incorrect. Time, and the type of time (which kind of time the measurement is being made in or for), is essential to the assignment of the proper meaning of the end result of a calculation or measurement. As we are aware, perspective is very important and thus, so is the type of time referenced in a calculation or measurement.
From: Modern Physics (electricity),
T4
Point 4: Time and energy are linked and exist in 3 defined states.Argument:
Quanta:
Relativity:
Macro or Big Time:From: T6,
T5A
Macro or Big Time: Singularity is the "at rest" state of energy. A singularity is absolute zero. All matter (and the energy from which it was born) has been Tetrised and exists as a perfect solid (not Pathagoras' or Platos'). The information that is carried in this state is now free from the matter that would prevent it from traveling (transmitting) freely, and skates "atop" the hypercooled mass unimpeded. In this state information transmission appears as if it:a) travels faster than the speed of light (though light itself can not exist here),
b) increases in speed with the passage of time (bearing in mind that time is 'big'), and
c) transmits its message an infinite distance instantaneously.Though the three items above are untrue, it appears as if that is what is happening. Here's why:
Because information, and the transmission thereof, is not dependent on matter, it is free (literally) to cavort with, and be indiscernible from, neighboring information, if I have a message, and you have a message, and we are standing in the same spacetime (it is a singularity after all), and we are not prevented from sharing our information with each other or other information, and there is nothing to prevent us from transmitting each other's information along with our own (non-sticky land), then it will appear as if all information is being transmitted simultaneously without impedance across an infinite distance in less than the apparent time it takes to create the information being transmitted.* There is no distance in a singularity so all information is everywhere everywhen.
*I refer to this phenomenon as the 'borrowed energy' effect, where energy is neither introduced nor lost, but simply acts as if there is more energy than originally existed. (A similar effect happens in our spacetime on a lesser scale. The winds of Neptune fly around the planet ever faster. This happens not because there is more energy being expended to increase the speed of the winds, (which would result in an increase in overall energy which could be measured [First Law again]), but because the resistance to the existing energetic motion is in a state of unbalance (coefficient of friction does not cancel out or overtake the energy expressed by the wind) resulting in faster windspeed. I wonder: If we were observers in quantum spacetime looking at this phenomenon in relativistic spacetime, would we see this increase as a form of perpetual motion and throw away our theories?)
From: T5B - Emp, From: T5C - Emp, From: Clipboard 1 -- 071607:,
T5B - Emp
Shannon's Theory of InformationShannon's theory of information is extremely important in work, much more so than its use in cryptography indicates. Intelligence agencies use Information Theory to keep classified information secret, and to discover as much information as possible about an adversary, in a future-proof secure way. The fundamental theorem leads us to believe it is much more difficult to keep secrets than it might first appear. In general it is not possible to stop the leakage of classified information, only to slow it. Furthermore, the more people who have access to the information, and the more those people have to work with and review that information, the greater the redundancy that information acquires. It is extremely hard to contain the flow of information that has high redundancy. This inevitable leakage of classified information is due to the psychological fact that what people know does somewhat influence their behavior, however subtle that influence might be.
Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory
To: T5A, From: Higgs Boson,
T5C - Emp
Some of the challenges we face today are:* We still lack measures and meters to define and appraise the amount of structure and organization embodied in artifacts and natural objects alike, a deficiency that antagonizes the development of many useful theories and applications, notably, in the biomedical sector.
* Information accumulates at a rate faster than it can be sifted through, accessed and digested by humans, so that the bottleneck, traditionally represented by the medium, is drifting towards the receiving end of the channel.
* Timeliness is an important dimension of Information. Time and space varying situations are hardly touched by Shannon Information (in Shannon theory one bit of Information sent over a network is received as one bit whether it arrives within a second or withing a day and we know it is not the same Information; similar situations arise in business, biology, life science, etc).
* In a growing number of situations, the overhead in accessing Information prevails over that of fruition, which makes information itself practically unattainable or obsolete.
* Capabilities akin to contents addressing and semantic access and transmission are not even in sight, while computing and communication infrastructures of the new Millennium induce drastic mutations on the conventional notions of Knowing and Learning, Guessing and Discovering.
* Microscopic systems seem not to obey Shannon postulates of Information. In the quantum world and on the level of living cells traditional Information often fails to accurately describe reality.
Ref: http://i2lab.ucf.edu/Events/workshop-2005-10-Szpankowski/
To: T5A, From: emails to steven dick re ufo:, From: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time,
Clipboard 1 -- 071607:Is it possible that a black hole is there, quiet, cold, consuming and as it 'evaporates' it manifests as a "warm" part of the universe?
Refs:
--S. Hawking, BHoT, pp. 187, Time's Arrow...
also pp. 142 fig. 7.12 (evaporates)--ibid., pp. 118, Black Hole temperature...
To: T5A, To: T5D - Emp, To: more lightmass, From: Momentum is gravity, To: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time,
T5D - Emp
If we now return to the question "Does light have mass?", this can be taken to mean different things if the light is moving freely or trapped in a container. The definition of the invariant mass of an object is m = sqrt{E2/c4 - p2/c2}. By this definition a beam of light is massless like the photons it is composed of. However, if light is trapped in a box with perfect mirrors so the photons are continually reflected back and forth in both directions symmetrically in the box, then the total momentum is zero in the box's frame of reference but the energy is not. Therefore the light adds a small contribution to the mass of the box. This could be measured--in principle at least--either by the greater force required to accelerate the box, or by an increase in its gravitational pull. You might say that the light in the box has mass, but it would be more correct to say that the light contributes to the total mass of the box of light. You should not use this to justify the statement that light has mass in general.Ref: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/light_mass.html
From: T5E, From: Must include lightmass, From: Higgs Boson, From: Mass, To: HB's: the Darkness and the Light, From: Clipboard 1 -- 071607:,
more lightmassThe only way to describe lightmass is to properly define how light is acted upon by two forces: gravity and optics, over a long distance.
If light is to be acted upon by gravity, then one must treat light as a PARTICLE and forget its wavelike properties (negating the effects of optics/lenses).
If light is to be acted upon by optics, then one must treat light as a WAVE and forget its particlelike peoperties (negating the effects of gravity).
However, if one chooses to say both properties exist, then a NEW measureent has to satisfy BOTH the lightlike and the wavelike properties (as described by the physicists).
Here, the argument convolutes and one can readily see the argument:Q: Doesn't gravity (over long distances?) act as a lens and therefore satisfy both conditions?
A: Yes. There are MANY circumstances which are satisfied by this rationale.
Q: Are all of the aforementioned circumstances (those specifically referred to as satisfied by the gravity explanation above) correct explanations for the passage of time?
A: No...
From: light is to hb , From: Clipboard 1 -- 071607:,
light is to hbLight is to a Higgs boson as ice is to water.
http://library.thinkquest.org/26111/lightismade.html
To: more lightmass, To: Must include lightmass, To: Higgs Boson,
T5E
One could conclude that a black hole functions as a 'box' in which the mass of the light within MUST add to the mass of the black hole (event horizon and all). Therefore, lightmass within each 'system' should not be excluded from mass/gravimetric calculations.theoretical:
90% (dark matter) of force interactions with matter are lightmass deficient in current calculations.or,
10% of force interactions are detectable; 10% of our universe is visible
To: T5D - Emp, From: Modern Physics (electricity), From: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time, To: Higgs Boson, From: HB's: the Darkness and the Light,
T5
Point 5: Pi is a better measuring stick for the passage (and type) of time than the atom.Argument: As evidenced by my previous arguments (and as is generally accepted [at least for quantum theory]), atoms cannot exist in either quantum time or big time and are therefore, a poor gauge for the passage of time or the measurement of spacetime.
To: T6, To: T7 (E1), To: Minkowskian Spacetime, From: Pi is not constant,
Gödel - the ebb and flow of time
Ref: p. 122-123 A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy of Gödel and Einstein"...an inconsistency between Einstein's theory and the everyday belief that time, unlike space, "passes" or "flows." On this question, two assumptions dominated, then as now, in the popular as well as the scientific consciousness. Both of them are faulty. The first is that special relativity is compatible with the passing of time, as long as it is acknowledged that this flow has only local, as opoosed to global, significance. The other is that the world according to special relativiety is a fixed four-dimensional spacetime "block," but that this does not conflict with teh deliverances of ordinary experience. The former fails because whatever the flow of time is, it is not a merely geometrical fact and thus cannot enjoy only local existence."
To: T5E, To: T7 (E1), To: T5C - Emp, To: Causality Violations, To: Modern Physics (electricity), From: Clipboard 1 -- 071607:,
Must include lightmass
One must include lightmass due to the fact that time does [appear to] flow. Thus, the movement (however minute in size or direction) of light is a quantifiable number and must therefore contribute to an increase in spacetime AND spacetime's acceleration/gravitational pull on our entire universe.To: T5D - Emp, From: light is to hb ,
T6
Point 6:
Mine is a Unified Field Ontology based on the following:An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization.
Ontologies as a specification mechanism -
A body of formally represented knowledge is based on a conceptualization: the objects, concepts, and other entities that are assumed to exist in some area of interest and the relationships that hold among them (Genesereth & Nilsson, 1987) . A conceptualization is an abstract, simplified view of the world that we wish to represent for some purpose. Every knowledge base, knowledge-based system, or knowledge-level agent is committed to some conceptualization, explicitly or implicitly.
Ref: http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html
For my ontology, i will need to quantify Time, (while noting if this quantification is in any way related to the HB), properly quantify Force, and equate them both to Mass.
?: what if pi = 3?From: T5, To: T4, To: T7 (E1), To: T8, To: Higgs Boson, From: Clipboard 2 -- 071707:,
Clipboard 2 -- 071707:An ontology is a flowchart. It represents the relationships between a philosophy and the physical systems that represent said philosophy.
Its goal is to present a physical system whose constitutent parts are paired with a logical philosophical sub-system in order to produce a reliable (that is, with very high predictive qualities) model of a very complex system.
To: T6,
Clipboard 3 -- 071707:
When in time was Pi first able to be expressed?Likewise, when in time was Pi first stable?
Higgs Boson
Hold atom in coldest place (gas) and continue to freeze until absolute atomic zero is reached via countervibrations to the atomic resonance."...H interacts with other particles; for example if H is near an electron, there is a force between the two. H is of a class of particles called "bosons".
...It is surprising that the field is not zero in empty space, but the result, not an obvious one, is: all particles that can interact with H gain mass from the interaction.
ref: http://hepwww.ph.qmw.ac.uk/epp/higgs1.html
To: T5B - Emp, To: T5D - Emp, From: T5E, From: T6, To: T7 (E1), From: Minkowskian Spacetime, From: Spin, To: HB's: the Darkness and the Light, From: light is to hb ,
T7 (E1)
We are aware that Pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. Unfortunately, time has not been accounted for in this measurement and that leaves a vital clue about the nature of Pi unrepresented. If we think of time using your representation of it as a light cone, then one must conclude that when one measures the diameter of any given circle, there is a beginning to the measurement and an ending to the measurement during which time has passed. This being the case, and knowing that a beginning and an end cannot happen simultaneously, one must conclude that the passage of time has offset the beginning measurement from the end measurement by a length of time represented as lp . This means that the start point and the end point can never meet - they pass each other always by length lp [...because time and space are being created not only while the measurement is taking place, but also after the measurement has taken place. Whatever markers were used to denote 'start' and 'stop' will move away from each other due to the expansion of spacetime.] Thus, the calculation never actually ends, it is merely marked along the way with whatever points we assign it.If we were to superimpose a dot onto your light cone representing a start point, and then add another dot representing an end point, we would see clearly that these points were offset (if even by the minutest of lengths) and that picture would (if drawn though enough time for an observer to reveal a long term pattern) show a spiral or coil that is indistinguishable from the skin of the light cone which expands (as does the light cone itself) with the passage of time.
Ref: Minkowskian Spacetime pp. 406 and Fig. 17.15 (the geometry underlying special relativity) The Road to Reality, A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Roger Penrose
From: T6, From: T5, From: Minkowskian Spacetime, From: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time, From: Higgs Boson, From: Ratios and Measurements, From: Pi is not constant,
Ratios and MeasurementsWhen is Pi stable after matter is created?
To: T7 (E1),
Pi is not constantPi cannot be constant because matter is not even. It's lumpiness is due to something (no matter what that something is right now). That something is a quantifiable means of showing the uneveness in the matter of the universe. If Pi is constant (meaning no deviations from its present AND COMPLETE numerical value) then the universe would have matter dispersed evenly throughout because Pi is a ratio which measures a distance. Since any distance traveled is a journey through spacetime, one must conclude that that spacetime is uneven (especially on the smallest levels) and therefore, Pi's value changes when it is measured accurately. The measurement is of a distance traveled across a length of spacetime, and that spacetime is proven to be uneven. No eveness exists in matter if spacetime is unevenly dispersed within the universe.
To: T5, To: T7 (E1),
Momentum is gravity
Spin, the momentum (and direction) imparted from the collison of a K-particle with K-matter, is the force to which we currently (and mistakenly) attribute the effects of gravity.To: Clipboard 1 -- 071607:, From: Clipboard 4 -- 071707,
Clipboard 4 -- 071707
Gravitational Unevenness:No such thing as gravitational unevenness. Higg's Bosons are stable - when they impart their momentum via spin/collisions, the matter assumes the directional orientation as imparted. Only then does matter have a direction -- Higg's Bosons and Time do not.
In the core of the collapsing "accretion disk" the HB reactions that imprat their momentum to matter are "aimed" at the center of their own mass (which is greater than the total matter masss in the system by a ratio of 9 to 1). the overall spin and momentum of the solar system or galaxy is predetermined by this mass' center of mass and the direction in which an HB is aimed (is light attracted to anything?) prior to imparting its energy to create matter.
Momentum Unevenness:
This can occur and gravitational unevenness should be attributable to only this: momentum will be imparted evenly, however, matter interactions can cause significant momentum-based "wobble." [see 'wobble' below] (As we have thus far described it) gravity exists (and is best defined) when matter is present. However, initial momentum exists outside the contstraints of our gravity-defined universe (outside the bounds of our gravity). It is clear that momentum CAN be affected by matter interactions. However, initial momentum CANNOT be affected by gravity because it is outside the bounds of our defined gravity.
Gravity like properties only manifest when matter is present.
Momentum Wobble:
When matter's direction changes, however slight, a wobble is noted in its life path. When lightlike wobble is caused (outside the bounds of our universe - no gravity - not a vaccuum) we see a pattern of interference.
Gravitation is non-existent. It is actually a combination of the effects of thermodynamics and nothing more.
To: Momentum is gravity,
T8
Pi is representative of an ever expanding coil, the tightness of which is representative of the speed with which time is passing and with which spacetime is growing.From: T6,
Gravity is really an effect of heat distribution and dissipation.
emails to steven dick re ufo:
06/21/07
I have changed the title from Unified Field Theory to Unified Field Ontology as I intend (at this point in my lit review) to show how the passage of time (especially on a quantum level) affects the placement of stored information with respect Shannon's Postulates of Information.* Microscopic systems seem not to obey Shannon postulates of Information. In the quantum world and on the level of living cells traditional Information often fails to accurately describe reality.
ME uft point 5: ...atoms cannot exist in either quantum time [...] and are therefore, a poor gauge for the passage of time or the measurement of spacetime.
Likewise, I feel that the traditional measurement of time and its passage are unsuitable for quantum measurements. (of course) Shannon's Postulates cannot accurately describe matter interactions at this level because the expansion of spacetime itself is unaccounted for. If Shannon had known to include a measurement that would detail how spacetime is constantly expanding (i.e. the data set is always moving away from itself due to the continual expansion of spacetime) then he would have been able to make a more accurate determination of the data under those conditions.
ME uft point 5 [...because time and space are being created not only while the measurement is taking place, but also after the measurement has taken place. Whatever markers were used to denote 'start' and 'stop' will move away from each other due to the expansion of spacetime.]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To: T5C - Emp,
Block 42
Spin
Higgs bosons are absolutely stable (they reside at atomic absolute zero). Their 'spin' is a momentum than can be passed on to matter as we know it. Light (the Higgs Boson part…light, fluffy, high entropy, dense variety - dark matter) permeates the universe and weaves matter from Higgs Bosons force interactions. Matter is formed and has not only a residual vibration (above molecular absolute zero), but also has the imparted momentum (in the direction we travel in time) from the initial force interaction with a Higgs Boson [ref. D:\uft\images\atom-smasher-bubble-chamber.jpg for a representation of one of the bi-products of this interaction].It is rather like watching a scissors close. Right where the blades meet, instead of cutting paper, it is creating it. Instead of one pair of scissors, there are trillions upon trillions. Instead of blades made of matter, they are force reactions between Higgs Bosons (minuter than minute). The weave of spacetime is created as the interactions develop the HB's imparted momentum and quantum vibration into stable(r) matter. By increasing the dimensions one would use to represent this single interaction view, one can easily see how this fabric's entropy would exponentially increase over a very short period of time.
To: Higgs Boson, From: Mass,
MassLightmass is bouyant and has extremely high entropy. It can, for instance, ghost-occupy the space that we see as occupied by the event horizon of a black hole. However, the matter has been crushed down and the lightmass has put its' high-entropy, fluffy, cold, dense (because it floats around the matter) self in the volume of space previously occupied by the matter of a black hole. (ref. Hawking, BHoT, "…nondecreasing behavior of a black hole's area…" pp. 130)
An agent (e.g. an autonomous robot) using a particular model will only be able to perceive that part of the world that his ontology is able to represent. In a sense, only the things in his ontology can exist for that agent. In that way, an ontology becomes the basic level of a knowledge representation scheme.
(ref. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/ONTOLI.html)To: Spin, To: T5D - Emp, From: HB's: the Darkness and the Light,
HB's: the Darkness and the Light
Remember, the darkness comes before the light.To: Mass, From: Higgs Boson, To: T5E, From: T5D - Emp,
Causality Violations
Cannot happen in full. The can appear or manifest as shadows or apparitions of themselves, and yes, they can transmit information. However, they cannot transmit all of their information from one timeline to another simultaneously. That being the case, effective transmition of data over any distance and over any time results in the loss of data.Time (Minkowskian imagery of cones) can fold back on itself. However, the placement of the overlying data can never occupy the same spacetime as the originating event and therefore, cannot prevail as "originating event."
Ref: The Spacetime of Einstein's general relativity pp. 409 and Fig. 17.17 and 17.18 (causality violations and the geometry of einstein's relativity) The Road to Reality, A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Roger Penrose
To: Minkowskian Spacetime, From: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time,
Minkowskian Spacetimemy thinking:The shape of spacetime = pi, show pi as it exists in minkowskian spacetime (conical tip - as all of spacetime is redundantly shaped as a bullet's path through smoke)
Ref: Minkowskian Spacetime pp. 406 and Fig. 17.15 (the geometry underlying special relativity) The Road to Reality, A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Roger Penrose
From: Causality Violations, To: T7 (E1), From: Modern Physics (electricity), From: T5, To: Higgs Boson,
Modern Physics (electricity)
3. Total Energy: E=K+mc2Ref: QuickStudy Student Reference Guide, Electricity, Modern Physics, para. 3. Total Energy
If one neglects to include K and says instead, E=mc2, one has forgotten to include the effects of kinetic energy and has effectively forgotten to include "moving time." That is, timespace that was created during the measurement and quantification of matter. On a relativistic timescale, there is little difference. However, in a quantum timespace, the difference is a matter of existing or not existing according to our accepted way of quantifying matter AND spacetime.
Again, it is NOT E=mc2, rather, it is a combination of energy, matter and light as recorded by an privileged (if somewhat isolated) observer. If said observer does not include gravity, the expansion of timespace or the mass (acceleration needed or gravitational pull) of lightmass.
To: Minkowskian Spacetime, To: T5E, From: Gödel - the ebb and flow of time, To: T3,
That's it for now. These are all really big topics and if you'd like to contact me about them, I welcome the opportunity.
email me: uft [at] jfk-webstudios dot com
Peace and Good Seeing...
